मंगलवार, 19 अप्रैल 2016

Office Politics and Networking



Do you like silent workers who make no fuss and complete their work with integrity?

Or, do you prefer workers who not only work but keep you informed about their achievements, making you wonder whether you are doing justice to their full potential?

I possess the temperament of the silent worker. Eleven years into my career, I was praised for it by my bosses in the multinational I served then, “Unlike others, he keeps to himself and does not indulge in negative activities.” I was rewarded with promotions and pay hikes. My career growth was better than that of my peers. I was included in conferences and meetings meant for senior officials. The Managing Director and the Vice Presidents were friendly to me. My words were respected. Unwittingly, I had become a sort of a yardstick. Though a lowly manager, I became part of a delegation to Singapore and China. I got selected as one of the top hundred salesmen worldwide, and was honoured in a special ceremony in Hawaii. I was given a double promotion and transferred to head the sales branch in Pune. What else could a silent worker ask for?

I smelt disharmony on my very first day at the Pune office. It had three sales engineers; two belonging to one division and the third belonging to another. Most of the business came from the first division. The lone engineer felt ignored. He did not keep others informed about his movements, and generally behaved like an outcast. He appeared to be struggling to run his separate office from within the existing one.

I corrected the situation by organising family events in which I insisted upon his presence. I also introduced a system of sitting together and sharing each-others’ lunch whenever possible. I observed an improvement in working relations, and was happy about it.

How mistaken I was!

One day I received a call from the divisional head of the outcast pal. The head spared no words in expressing his disappointment in me, demanding to know why was I preventing his engineer from attending to phone calls during the lunch period; why was I leaving the office within fifteen minutes after the closure time; and why was I not entertaining his engineer’s customers.

I was at a complete loss of words! It was true that I discouraged colleagues from taking calls during lunch. There were no cell phones then. One had to leave the table to take a call, and others had to wait for the person to join back. Just three calls could stretch the fifteen-minute lunch to thirty minutes.

I used to leave the office shortly after office hours, because I wanted to give time in the evening to my small children. I was travelling most of the days, when I did not see them at all.

So far as not visiting the engineer’s customers was concerned, I balanced my time amongst all three engineers, visiting customers who merited it.

Obviously, the engineer had used my name to protect himself from the aggressive division head. Sharing the reality with the head would not have cut much ice. The damage was done. My good intentions were thwarted by the short-sightedness of some people. I started looking for a change, and within a year changed jobs.

The company I joined had a young managing director. He told me that my earlier bosses spoke well about me, one of them going to the extent of accusing, “You have poached one of our best boys.” I headed the Mumbai region, away from the MD and Vice Presidents who sat in Pune and elsewhere. I increased sales by 50% in two years, made inroads into white goods bigwigs such as Godrej & Boyce, and, true to my silent worker style, did not make a single courtesy call to the MD during the period.

That proved to be my undoing. I never became close to the MD, and finally left the company on completion of my three-year contract.

The worst was yet to come. After a one-year stint in another company, where I was instrumental in effecting a 100% increase in sales, I realised that unless one was also good at politicking, delivering good results alone was not sufficient. I decided to try my hand at doing business. I had saved a decent sum, my provident fund was good, and investing these two I could easily manage the setting up and the initial year, I thought.

The company was launched.

The business was dull, but I was trying. I had the back up of an international IT giant. How could I fail, when lesser known outfits were doing so well? I kept on paying the royalty, and worked hard to expand the business. And then, one day, the skies fell. The company unceremoniously closed the business unit under which my company was operating. Not only was my investment wiped out, I was left to start life afresh with not a penny in my pocket!

I nurse no grudge, no ill feeling towards those who did wrong to me. But I have a regret. I wish I had been able to change my nature, and had networked my way to the head of the division, to the MD, and to the IT giant’s business unit. I would have been better prepared for the unfair onslaughts then. I still look upon office politics as a dirty word; but ability to network can be a saviour.

Now, coming back to the two questions I asked in the beginning. There is no harm in preferring workers who not only work but keep you informed about their achievements. But, before believing them, please check – are they taking undue advantage of the silence of a colleague; are they misinforming you; are they serving neither your company nor you but only themselves?

कोई टिप्पणी नहीं: