मंगलवार, 20 फ़रवरी 2024

Promoting Nonviolence Violently!

 I had forgotten all about it. Who remembers incidents that happened 52 years ago? But then, as I watched the 1923 movie ‘Society of the Snow’, it started gradually coming back. On October 13, 1972, a short-duration chartered flight had crashed over the Andes. Search for the aircraft was abandoned after eight days, and the survivors were left to fend for themselves under extremely cold conditions. There was hardly anything to eat. A single biscuit for three days, cotton stuffing of the seats, leather of belts and shoes—the survivors tried everything till their body started consuming itself. Their urine output reduced to a few drops of black liquid. The ordeal continued for more than 70 days for the final survivors, who were left with no option but to cannibalise the dead co-passengers.

            Some creatures are carnivore. Other animals are their food. The herbivore mostly eat plants but may also drink milk which is an animal product; and the omnivore eat plants and food of animal origin. Humans, and many human deities, are omnivore. The Muniyandi Swami temple in Madurai offers chicken and mutton biryani as prasad on its annual three-day festival, the Vimala temple in Puri doles out fish and mutton dishes during the Durga Puja festival, the Tarkulha Devi temple in Gorakhpur serves mutton during the Khichari Mela, the Parassinik Kadavu temple in Kerala has a prasad of fish and toddy, and the meat or fish at the Kalighat temple in Kolkata, the Kamakhya temple in Assam, the Tarapith in Birbhim in West Bengal and Dakshineswar in the same state are not unknown (The Times of India, July 13, 2022). Some years ago my aunt was appalled to see eggs being offered at the Pashupatinath temple in Kathmandu. I have seen meat dishes being enjoyed at Durga Puja pandals. Bengali and Maithil priests relish fish and meat. The meat and seafood delicacies served to Budhhist monks in Thailand can easily be the pride of the best gourmet meals. The Dalai Lama is not averse to eating meat. Some people quote an instance of Ram and Lakshman eating deer meat from the Valmiki Ramayana, while some others point out meat-eating instances in the Mahabharata.



            As per a mythological story, the Buddha-to-be was a hare in a previous birth. He decided to perform sacrifice by offering his favourite food, green succulent grass, to humans. Finding no takers, he realised that humans didn’t eat grass but loved to eat animal meat. Exercising the highest sacrifice, he resolved to offer himself as food. Learning about it, Lord Indra came to him in the disguise of a hungry Brahmin and asked for food. The hare jumped in the fire to get cooked. However, Lord Indra saved him and commemorated the ultimate sacrifice by placing an imprint of the hare on the moon. Some other versions of this story also exist, but the gist remains the same.

            Violence, a killing to be exact, is associated with meat eating (to be fair to him, Dalai Lama advocates eating naturally dead animals). Seekers of non-violence oppose the consumption of meat because of that reason. American Indologist Wendy Doniger writes about (Non)Violence as below in The Hindus - An Alternative History:

            The term “nonviolence” (ahimsa) originally applied not to the relationship between humans but to the relationship between humans and animals. Ahimsa means “the absence of the desire to injure or kill,” a disinclination to do harm, rather than an active desire to be gentle; it is a double negative, perhaps best translated by the negative “nonviolence”, which suggests both mental and physical concern for others. The roots of ahimsa may lie in Vedic ritual, in animal sacrifice, in the argument that the priest does not actually injure the animal but merely “pacifies” him; the primary meaning of ahimsa is thus to do injury without doing injury, a casuist argument from its very inception. In the Rig Veda (the earliest Sanskrit text, from c. 1200 BCE), the word ahimsa refers primarily to the prevention of injury or violence to the sacrifice and his offspring, as well as his cattle (10.22.13). 

            For Mahtma Gandhi, nonviolence was the search for truth and love in the sense of selfless service of one’s fellow beings. He considered poverty as the worst form of violence.

In other words, a soldier killing the enemy may be simply performing his duty, a butcher slicing strips of meat may just be creating food for the needy, and an eagle picking up a mountain goat may be just carrying its meal. At the same time, a thief stealing money, a policeman slapping a helpless widow, and a youth setting fire to someone’s house may be indulging in violence.

What must be opposed—meat eating or violence? If meat eating is synonymous with violence and so must be opposed, is it justified to make that protest violent? Isn’t that a fallacy?

कोई टिप्पणी नहीं: