गुरुवार, 22 दिसंबर 2016

Dubai and Delhi – A Tale of Contrasts

Today’s Khaleej Times reports about the approval of Dubai budget for 2017. Today, i.e., December 22, 2016. Can the implementation begin in less than ten days? Obviously, yes! Since Dubai budgets in the past have been implemented successfully, there is no reason to think otherwise.

Ok, so let us look at the Dubai budget. The total outlay is Dh47.3 b. Converting into Indian rupees, it amounts to 85,140 crore. Delhi’s current budget is for Rs.46,600 crore. So, the Dubai budget is 45% greater than the Delhi budget.

A quick look at the Dubai budget reveals that the 45% amount by which it exceeds the Delhi budget is allotted to innovation and welfare in Dubai. Yes, innovation and welfare. And, do not confuse it with infrastructure, for which a substantial 17% is allotted separately. In other words, a total of 69% of the budget will be spent on innovation, welfare and infrastructure. In comparison, the Delhi budget has 35% towards educational infrastructure, facilities and welfare.

Admittedly, Delhi cannot be compared with Dubai. Delhi was established in the year 736; if one ignores the mention of Indraprastha in ancient epics. Dubai, on the other hand, would not be older than 200 years or so.

Delhi thrived on natural bounty – fertile land, Yamuna water and pleasant weather. Dubai started with desert, sea water, and hostile weather. In spite of having a head start and natural advantages, Delhi lost to Dubai. Be it law and order, power supply, garbage management, education, health services, quality of goods and services, improvements, freedom to practise religion and follow culture – Dubai is far superior than Delhi. Dubai has even a minister of happiness!

Think about it, and all the pointers lead towards superb governance. It was efficient governance that brought laurels to Singapore; and it is governance that is making the world treat Dubai with envy. I have not seen anyone leading a protest march or staging a dharna in Dubai, though almost every other face here is that of an Indian, largely from Kerala.

The contrast between Dubai and Delhi, and other Indian cities for that matter, can be closed if we stop misunderstanding democracy and misusing freedom. Freedom should not be to shirk work, seek bribe, damage property and hurt others. Can we practise such disciplined freedom in India? How will the politicians survive then?

सोमवार, 5 दिसंबर 2016

When the Dream Shatters

As the Tamil Nadu chief minister J Jayalalithaa battles for life, police has been put on high alert to prevent the mass hysteria, should the tragedy occur. Suicides, arson, looting – there are no holds barred on the demise of popular figures these days. Prime minister Rajiv Gandhi justified the horrible carnage following the death of Mrs Indira Gandhi, declaring “when a big tree falls, the earth shakes”.

What does a person gain by committing suicide on the death of a popular figure? Why does he become so weak to end life at the death of a person with whom he presumably had no direct contact? And that too, when we carry on with our lives after the death of our closest relatives and friends?

The clue lies in the habit of blind idol worshipping. MK Gandhi insisted throughout his life that he was no saint but a politician; but his followers would have none of it. He was a ‘mahatma’, a great soul, for them. Atal Behari Vajpayee called Mrs Indira Gandhi ‘Durga’, a Hindu Goddess; MF Husain drew her as Durga in his painting; and the Congress President Dev Kant Barua said, “Indira is India and India is Indira”.

You can face very unpleasant consequences if you dare to  differ in opinion with Narendra Modi these days. Be prepared to be shouted out, heckled, or interrogated by the police if you voice an intelligent but different opinion. He, being the current rage, cannot do anything wrong, he is the ultimate authority on everything - believe his followers. They do not realise that Modi, being human, is as susceptible to committing errors as everybody else is. Modi has provided enough proofs of his vulnerability in his speeches. In spite of being a politician, he mistook the 16th Lok Sabha as the 14th; in spite of vying for the post of the prime minister he said that the rupee was equal to a dollar in 1947 whereas it was equal to 30 cents then; in spite of being a Gujarati and a BJP leader he assumed that the Bharatiya Jan Sangh founder Shyama Prasad Mookherjee was a proud  son of Gujarat and died in 1930 while actually Mr Mookherjee was a Bengali and died in 1953; he placed Chandra Gupta Maurya in the Gupta dynasty and not the Maurya dynasty; he announced that the August 15 speech is delivered from Lal Darwaza while it is actually delivered from the historical Lal Quila; and to top it all, he referred to the father of the nation Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi as Mohanlal Karamchand Gandhi.

Humans are humans. They commit errors. They become old, fade and die. The first superstar, Rajesh Khanna, was spotted crying at the Kolkata airport in his later years. Some Indian considered MK Gandhi not worthy of worship but of being felled by his bullet. Ditto with Mrs Gandhi. Her staunch followers turned against her. The Narendra Modi magic is also bound to end one day. But till that happens, the sycophants will butter their bread.

We can either groom the public figures as humans, and get the best of them for everyone’s welfare. Or, we can treat them as idols, worship them, and ultimately immerse them in water.